2 minutes read
Justice Varma has been temporarily relieved of judicial duties pending the investigation, and the Supreme Court has directed him to preserve all phone data and communications, while also requesting security staff records from his residence over the past six months.
The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has vehemently opposed Justice Varma’s transfer, arguing in a letter on March 21 that their court is “not a trash bin” and raising concerns about judicial integrity and vacancies.
Also Read- Ojing Tasing inaugurates ancient bat roost cave ‘Ponrung’ in Siang district
On March 20, 2025, the Supreme Court Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, proposed transferring Justice Varma back to his parent court, the Allahabad High Court, where he had previously served until October 2021.
Meanwhile, the Congress party, through spokesperson Pawan Khera, has demanded transparency, questioning whose money it was and why it was at the judge’s residence, especially given his involvement in high-profile cases like the Unnao rape case.
#BREAKING Video shared by Delhi Police Commissioner regarding the fire at Justice Yashwant Varma’s house, when cash currencies were discovered. pic.twitter.com/FEU50vHwME
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) March 22, 2025
The inquiry is ongoing, with forensic analysis and Justice Varma’s response under review. The Supreme Court has emphasized that the transfer is not the final action, and further steps, potentially including resignation or parliamentary removal under Article 124(4) of the Constitution, could follow based on the panel’s findings. The incident has sparked broader debates about judicial accountability and transparency in India.
A fire broke out at Justice Yashwant Varma’s official residence in New Delhi on March 14, 2025, during the Holi break, while he was out of town. His family members alerted the fire brigade and police, who extinguished the blaze. Following this, authorities reportedly discovered a significant amount of cash at the residence. The discovery triggered widespread concern and prompted immediate action from the judiciary.