1 minute read
Justice Trivedi clarified that the previous order was not a direction but an expectation, as the petitioner had filed a separate case regarding subsequent contracts. He said the court had not directed the CAG to submit the report.
Bhushan responded that the order was meaningless without any response from the CAG. He informed the court that despite sending two letters to the CAG, no response had been received.
Also Read- Arunachal: Professor Taro Sindik and Tadam Ruti participate in Nalanda Gyan Kumbh 2024
However, Justice Trivedi asked Bhushan to withdraw the application and take appropriate legal action or approach the CAG directly.
The Court accepted the request and recorded in its order that the miscellaneous application stood withdrawn, allowing the applicant to pursue remedies permissible under the law.